<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The GPS told me to do it (PerryGeo)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kelsocartography.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kelsocartography.com/blog/?p=2672</link>
	<description>Blogging at KelsoCartography.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Hoober</title>
		<link>http://kelsocartography.com/blog/?p=2672&#038;cpage=1#comment-19359</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hoober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kelsocartography.com/blog/?p=2672#comment-19359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this is not &quot;caveats in the meta-data&quot; but something we need to work out in UI presentation. machine-era outputs are generally pretty good at expressing limits-of-precision. Digital-era outputs seem designed to kill people. 

One of my favorite examples is the temp readout during the TMI-2 accident. The digital readout says 280°. Hot, but not dangerous yet. But that&#039;s the readout, which someone decided could work like a dial and just stop at off-scale-high. Without the dial telling you this, no one knew that it was not 280° but &quot;off scale high&quot; and therefore unknown-bad. Just make the digital readout like the mechanical dial and everyone is much more informed. 

I ranted about it a tad more at the blog I never update anymore here: http://shoobe01.blogspot.com/2007/06/off-scale-high.html

There are, similarly, good ways to express position on a moving map display (though often ignored) but even then position is always numerically expressed to the meter or better. Which is wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is not &#8220;caveats in the meta-data&#8221; but something we need to work out in UI presentation. machine-era outputs are generally pretty good at expressing limits-of-precision. Digital-era outputs seem designed to kill people. </p>
<p>One of my favorite examples is the temp readout during the TMI-2 accident. The digital readout says 280°. Hot, but not dangerous yet. But that&#8217;s the readout, which someone decided could work like a dial and just stop at off-scale-high. Without the dial telling you this, no one knew that it was not 280° but &#8220;off scale high&#8221; and therefore unknown-bad. Just make the digital readout like the mechanical dial and everyone is much more informed. </p>
<p>I ranted about it a tad more at the blog I never update anymore here: <a href="http://shoobe01.blogspot.com/2007/06/off-scale-high.html" rel="nofollow">http://shoobe01.blogspot.com/2007/06/off-scale-high.html</a></p>
<p>There are, similarly, good ways to express position on a moving map display (though often ignored) but even then position is always numerically expressed to the meter or better. Which is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
