<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resolving the iPhone resolution (Discover)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kelsocartography.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kelsocartography.com/blog/?p=3889</link>
	<description>Blogging at KelsoCartography.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ces</title>
		<link>http://kelsocartography.com/blog/?p=3889&#038;cpage=1#comment-51292</link>
		<dc:creator>ces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kelsocartography.com/blog/?p=3889#comment-51292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In practice, Jobs is right... http://www.kybervision.com/Blog/files/AppleRetinaDisplay.html

20/20 is only the minimum standard for vision, but it&#039;s enough for the iPhone 4 display to be considered Retina. Soneira says Jobs is wrong, because he is basing his numbers off of 20/12 or 20/16 vision, which is the highest human vision acuity, not the norm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In practice, Jobs is right&#8230; <a href="http://www.kybervision.com/Blog/files/AppleRetinaDisplay.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.kybervision.com/Blog/files/AppleRetinaDisplay.html</a></p>
<p>20/20 is only the minimum standard for vision, but it&#8217;s enough for the iPhone 4 display to be considered Retina. Soneira says Jobs is wrong, because he is basing his numbers off of 20/12 or 20/16 vision, which is the highest human vision acuity, not the norm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
